An Image Problem.
Last week
I wrote a blog post which concluded that many self-publishers would probably
burn out from the estimated twelve hour days needed to write and successfully promote
their books. To illustrate the blog post I used a picture of a crazed Jack
Nicholson from The Shining. For those who have not seen it, in that movie Jack
plays a writer looking after a near empty haunted hotel. He is suffering a
minor dose of writer’s block and ends up typing up a manuscript with “all work
and no play makes Jack a dull boy” repeated over and over again.
According to the Arts Law Centre of Australia, you can only use someone else’s images in your blog if:
I used the
image of Jack as a subtle illustration of an overworked writer going crazy.
But when I
placed a link to the post on Google+ I received a comment asking me if I knew
that the image was probably copyrighted. I had not thought of that. I resisted
telling the guy who mentioned it to get the stick out of his bum. But after a
bit of research, I am glad he pointed it out.
Copyright
Laws
According to the Arts Law Centre of Australia, you can only use someone else’s images in your blog if:
- The copyright duration has expired and the work is in the "public domain";
- you have the copyright owner's permission;
- there is sufficient acknowledgement and using the image would be a "fair dealing" for the purpose of criticism and review, parody and satire, or reporting news; or
- the image is "clip art" – sometimes referred to as royalty free work, copyright-free work, shareware or freeware (e.g. Creative Commons resources such as OpenPhoto).
I do consider the post one of “reporting the news”, where the news is
the success and writing habits of writers who self-publish. But the article
does not refer directly to the movie The
Shining, so if I go back and add a comment to the blog that “we don’t want to
end up like Jack in The Shining
(pictured above)” does that bring the use of the image under the provisions of
the fair dealing exception? I have no idea as there seems to be a distinct lack
of legal precedent to go by in Australia and the US. Has any blogger ever been
sued by a movie studio for inappropriately using an image from their film? Or
do the movie’s producers consider it free publicity?
I have only used one image from an entire movie, sort of like copying a
sentence from a novel. .Although I believe it is highly unlikely I would be
sued for using the image, I do want to do the right thing. As a writer, I am
adamant that a writer’s copyright should be respected, so I should show the
same respect for other copyright owners. So from now on, unless I am commenting
on a particular film or book, I will refrain from using images from them to pretty
up my blog.
Comments
Post a Comment