Anonymous Reviews
A new Australian
newspaper called Saturday is set to come onto the market next year. I hope it
does well, we need a lot more diversity in the Australian market. The newspaper
will review books, nothing unusual there. What is unusual is the book reviewers
will be anonymous, with the by-line for each review just containing made-up
initials.
In a
discussion on the Sunday Extra program on Radio National Erik Jensen, the editor of the newspaper,
said that anonymity should lead to more fearless reviews. He said many book
reviewers were prone to timid reviews as they did not want to offend writers
they knew in the small Australian literary scene. This argument is frequently
used to criticise the standard of literary criticism in Australia. Whether it
is true, can only really be answered by each individual reviewer.
Jensen
feels that giving reviewers anonymity will make them more fearless in their
reviews, and result in better reviews. Stephen Romei, the literary editor of
the Australian, was also part of the Sunday Extra program. He wondered if
anonymity might encourage more negative reviews of books, as the reviewers
tried to show that anonymity meant they were now free to say what they really
thought about a book.
There is
always the problem that a writer who personally dislikes another writer could use
their anonymity to attack that writer. Conversely, if there is no by-line, how
do we know that a glowing review was not written by the writer’s best mate or
an editor who hopes to win the author over to their publishing house.
I read
reviews in The Age, and I always
check who the reviewer is so I can establish where they are coming from and if
they have any knowledge of the genre they are reviewing. For example, Lucy
Sussex (pictured) one of The Age reviewers, is a literature professor at Latrobe
University who writes speculative fiction so I feel she is qualified to judge science
fiction.
In
contrast, I read a review in The Age by
a literature professor of a Mathew Reilly book. The professor seemed to judge
it against classical works of literature, and not as the techno-thriller it is.
His big complaint was the lack of sex, which seemed like a juvenile attempt at
suggesting readers of techno-thrillers are asexual.
I would
prefer reviews to have a by-line and be knowledgeable and fearless, but also tactful.
Would you
bother reading anonymous reviews? I am not sure I would. I am unlikely to read
anonymous reviews on Amazon.
Comments
Post a Comment