Review of Margaret Atwood's The Testaments
Unless you only get your
news from a Donald Trump authorised news source, you’d know that The Testaments is Margaret
Atwood’s recently released sequel to The Handmaids Tale. I loved The
Handmaid’s Tale when I first read it a few decades ago. It had great world
building and created a believable brutal vision of a right-wing theocracy in an
almost post-apocalyptic US (Gilead). I re-read The Handmaid’s Tale about
a year and a half ago for a university course, where we studied the text in-depth,
so it was still relatively fresh in my mind as I read The Testaments. I
have not watched any of The Handmaid’s Tale television series, so maybe
people who have will have made different connections to The Testaments than
I did, and have different reactions.
The Testaments takes us back to Gilead 16 years after The
Handmaid’s Tale. It tells the story from three points of view. From that of
a 16 year-old-teenager whose mother escaped with her from Gilead to Canada when
she was a baby. One of the four head Aunts who is complicit in imposing the
strict regime of oppression on the women of Gilead is the second storyteller. The
final storyteller is a teenager who has grown up in Gilead and flees an attempted
arranged marriage to wind up joining the Aunts.
The story has a plot,
which is not fully explained by the author. Atwood leaves it up to the reader
to work out why some things happen rather than have one of the characters tell
the reader why she is doing something. For example, I wondered why the Aunt chooses
a particular courier to secretly transfer documents out of Gilead. A reader looking
for plot holes might think they had found one as it took me a while to figure
out the reasons that particular courier was chosen.
The novel switches back
and forth from each point of view, but unlike many novels that use this
technique, I wasn’t regretting the frequent change of viewpoint as I was keen
to find out more of that person’s story. This indicates that all the story lines
were equally important and not dominated by one main story line with interrupting
subplots. The plot cohesively enveloped the whole novel.
I found the novel a
real page-turner and read its 400 pages in five sittings, which is very quick
for me. I particularly enjoyed discovering more about how Gilead came into
being and the origins and motivations of the original Aunts.
The Testaments’ words flow off the page. Atwood is very much a writer
who writes for readers. She would rather impress with her ideas, themes and story
than with the cleverness of her word usage. I have read four of her other
novels, including the excellent Maddaddam trilogy, so she is one of my
favourite authors.
The Testaments has a much more definite ending than the somewhat
ambiguous ending of The Handmaid’s Tale. Overall, I think The
Testaments is an excellent end to the world of Gilead, but it is not as
good as The Handmaid’s Tale as it created Gilead and the belief system imposed
on the people there. I think The Handmaid’s Tale would have been a more
worthy winner of the Booker Prize. But The Testaments is still a great
novel, from a great writer of speculative fiction.
Comments
Post a Comment